I found a news report of a publicly traded real-estate-related information compared to that reminds me of a construction company and real estate and housing transactions between the purchaser information, it really is that government policy can be done moderately open, so that other people can make a fair, just and open the basic principles; now I find that the practice of governments not consistent with my other hand, the Taiwan government in this respect is not enough information out but is also very transparent, and often suffer the people of Taiwan themselves.
Housing data transparency will allow the general public chat solution can be to complete the transaction of housing transactions in the various regions Quotes whether there is land speculation suspected, the public needs to know the transaction information is reliable. In Hong Kong, this part of the relative to do the best; Taiwan are based on the "Personal Data Protection Act" relationship, housing and publicly traded messages but not transparent enough. On the contrary, the United States and mainland China by the industry will be submitted to government agencies, trade information, to some extent, even if disclosed, would still be dealing with the actual population I am afraid will differ. As for Hong Kong is relatively open lot, think of Taiwan, we ourselves are often intermediaries to the monopoly, message reliability, real anger.
The following are the relevant States URL link:
Taiwan, http://ehi.cpami.gov.tw
HongKong, http://www.centadata.com/phome.aspx
Beijing, http://210.75.213.164/public/index.asp
USA, http://www.dqnews.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment